The Cost, Risk and Commitment Test of Warehousing

When additional warehousing or storage capacity isAlthough this option scores low on risk and
required there are many options a company cancommitment, the costs could sting when they
take, each with differing pros and cons. When extraeventually show themselves!
capacity or a change to existing warehousingOPTION 4
configuration is required in a recession the pros andIf all these options are non-appealing you could
cons need to be taken more seriously, particularly inconsider a complete relocation to the 'perfect' site
relation to cost, risk and commitment.with the 'perfect' warehouse. This option is of course
So, just what choices are there ?a very last resort and would need a strong portfolio
OPTION 1of other business reasons to warrant it. Not to
First option might be to consider a new build on sitemention the fact that it goes off the scale on our
as an investment solution. If cash flow and growthcost, risk and commitment measure. 'Risk' is probably
are strong this might be a worthwhile consideration.the strongest contender here with the possibility of
In a recession, however, it is risky and scores high oncustomer and employee losses through major change
cost, risk and commitment.causing insecurity and mistrust.
OPTION 2OPTION 5
Secondly, what buildings, facilities and space youThankfully, there is a fifth option that eliminates the
currently have? Would a refurbishment of existingcosts of off-site hiring and the risk and commitment
facilities and some site reconfiguration create theof building or relocating. If you can hire a temporary
warehousing space you require?on-site warehouse for a short period during a
Refurbishment and improvement projects canrefurbishment project, why not hire one longer term?
become problematical when operational capacity isIn these current times of economic uncertainty this
affected. This is when you need a temporary building.option barely registers on our measure allowing
With the ability to deliver and install in days acompanies to quickly and easily expand warehousing
temporary building can provide the essentialspace with no capital outlay, no commitment and low
replacement warehousing, storage or operationalcost.
space while existing buildings are out of action. OnceThe benefits come with the simplicity; light, modular
you have your new warehouse the temporaryand quick to fit or dismantle buildings anchor to the
building can easily be dismantled and returned. Youground as opposed to requiring civil works. As a
would never know it had been there.longer-term warehouse however they still fit the bill
OPTION 3meeting all British Standards for structural integrity
Our third warehousing option is a temporary off-siteequivalent to a permanent building and coming with a
warehouse. In a recession good deals can be had asten year guarantee on the aluminium frames.
more and more warehouses stand empty andCONCLUSION
unused. That said, there are disadvantages to hiringDuring this recession a temporary on-site warehouse
off-site. Security is a key issue. Although no one withis most certainly the best option when so many
'sort after' or valuable goods would choose abusinesses are unable to foresee or predict future
warehousing site that was slack on security, yougrowth.
can't beat knowing everything is under one roof -Once we start to move out of the recession
yours! Many companies choose to retain warehousingtemporary on-site warehouses still have an important
on site for this reason alone. Furthermore, althoughrole to play for UK businesses. Keeping a business
sq m charges of off-site warehouses may looklean and mean on low overheads and the ability to
appealing there are, as always, hidden costs. Theexpand and retract operations at the drop of a hat
additional transport costs will add up, not to mentionwill keep you healthy and ahead of the competition in
the logistical headache of co-ordinating the two sitesrecession, recovery or growth.
and relevant staff.